TELEWORKING IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE PRACTICES IN THE JUDICIARY OF CENTRAL WESTERN BRAZIL
Abstract
Public management in the Judiciary follows the principle of efficiency. The creation of the electronic process was one of the paths thought as a strategy for its attainment, which enabled the adoption of telework in the scope of the mentioned Power. However, the Covid-19 pandemic accelerated the digital transformation and the massive adoption of the flexible work regime. The literature reports the absence of a unified standard, leaving it up to each agency to regulate the implementation of its telework regime. In this sense it is appropriate to prepare this study, which aims to analyze the administrative foundations of telework adopted in institutions of the Judiciary, located in central-western Brazil. To this end, a documentary research was conducted, with a qualitative approach, adopting the literature review method. Considering the broad structure of the Brazilian Judiciary, a qualified comparative analysis of the Resolutions in effect at the Courts of Justice in the Midwest region was chosen for the documentary study. The results show the differences and similarities of the documents that govern the telework modality in the bodies studied. It is concluded that, despite some differences, the normatives present great similarity, a fact that is justified because they follow the guidelines of the Resolution of the National Council of Justice.
Downloads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which allows sharing the work with recognition of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
The author declares to be responsible for the originality, uniqueness and currency of the article content, by means of complete references to all consulted sources.
Each author grants to the LexCult Journal permission to evaluate, normalize, edit and publish the submitted article, in an unprecedented way.
Plagiarism cases and self plagiarism will not be accepted under no circumstances. The plagiarist will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years.
The copy, in full or to some extent, of an article published in LexCult Journal will be allowed as long as the source (author and Journal) is informed, being forbidden the commercial use and the production and distribution of derivative works. In case the exclusivity clause is broken, the submission will be filed and the author will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years, without bringing any civil actions provided by national law.
The author is aware that:
a) Submissions may be rejected if the journal's Editorial Board, responsible for evaluation and article selection, does not consider it pertinent for publication, whatever may be the well-justified reasons;
b) Editors reserve the right to modify the submitted manuscript - without any content alteration - in view of its normalization and adaptation to the publication norms.
