THE PURSUIT OF JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE EFFICIENCY UNDER THE FOCUS OF QUALIFICATION OF EMPLOYEES WITH OR WITHOUT DISABILITIES AT TJGO: AN INSIGHT INTO THE ESCOLA JUDICIAL DE GOIÁS (EJUG)
Abstract
This article discusses the role played by the Judicial School of Goiás (EJUG) in the relentless pursuit of judicial performance efficiency within the scope of the State of Goiás Court of Justice (TJGO), with a special emphasis on the qualification of employees, including those with disabilities. Based on constitutional provisions that prescribe the indispensable duty of federative entities to promote the training of their public agents, the study explores the preeminence of professional training for judges and judicial employees. Resolution No. 159 issued by the Honorable National Council of Justice and the establishment of the aforementioned EJUG are addressed, highlighting the broad scopes that permeate the institution, encompassing official courses, postgraduate programs, symposiums, and lectures in accordance with the guidelines established by the National School of Training and Improvement of Judges (ENFAM). EJUG carries out a wide-ranging performance within the Judiciary, encompassing the dissemination of ethical values, the development of judges and employees in the central core, as well as the improvement of administrative practices. The proposed research aims to investigate the intrinsic issues and challenges faced by EJUG, taking into account the qualification of employees, both those affected by some form of limitation and those without such circumstances, emphasizing the magnitude of inclusion and corporate education for achieving efficient and equitable judicial performance. This study holds unquestionable relevance by contributing to the improvement of the judicial apparatus, fostering the provision of accessible, effective, and equitable judicial services to the community.
Downloads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which allows sharing the work with recognition of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
The author declares to be responsible for the originality, uniqueness and currency of the article content, by means of complete references to all consulted sources.
Each author grants to the LexCult Journal permission to evaluate, normalize, edit and publish the submitted article, in an unprecedented way.
Plagiarism cases and self plagiarism will not be accepted under no circumstances. The plagiarist will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years.
The copy, in full or to some extent, of an article published in LexCult Journal will be allowed as long as the source (author and Journal) is informed, being forbidden the commercial use and the production and distribution of derivative works. In case the exclusivity clause is broken, the submission will be filed and the author will be prohibited to publish in LexCult Journal for 5 years, without bringing any civil actions provided by national law.
The author is aware that:
a) Submissions may be rejected if the journal's Editorial Board, responsible for evaluation and article selection, does not consider it pertinent for publication, whatever may be the well-justified reasons;
b) Editors reserve the right to modify the submitted manuscript - without any content alteration - in view of its normalization and adaptation to the publication norms.
